Supreme Court
See every discussion that mentions Supreme Court
Brand Details
Type: Not available
Description: Not available
Website: Not available
Mention Analytics
Total Mentions: 14
Subreddit Mentions:
Positive Mentions: 2
Negative Mentions: 7
Sign up to filter, search, and track the sentiment of all brand mentions for Supreme Court over time.
May 14, 2025
Birthright Citizenship Reaches the Supreme Court
💬 147 comments
⬆︎ 200 upvotes
Discussion about the court and its decisions.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/Apr 25, 2025
Trump Appears Unaware Supreme Court Ruled 9-0 Against Him: ‘That’s Not What My People Told Me’
💬 75 comments
⬆︎ 1611 upvotes
Reference to the Supreme Court ruling implies a negative context to the court system.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/💬 61 comments
⬆︎ 683 upvotes
Referenced in a negative context, about possible wrongdoings.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/Apr 15, 2025
"I did not think he would get this authoritarian this fast." — Jon Stewart on Trump's refusal to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador
💬 184 comments
⬆︎ 354 upvotes
Mentioned in the context of the legal case.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/Apr 14, 2025
Trump administration contends it has no duty to return illegally deported man to US. The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return.
💬 148 comments
⬆︎ 420 upvotes
Implied criticism of the Supreme Court's inaction.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/Apr 13, 2025
DOJ update on Abrego-Garcia
💬 20 comments
⬆︎ 62 upvotes
The court is mentioned in the discussion in a negative context, with users expressing that the DOJ is not following the court order.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/Apr 11, 2025
Poilievre vows not to pass abortion restrictions if elected prime minister - National | Globalnews.ca
💬 1344 comments
⬆︎ 2203 upvotes
The user mentions the potential for judges to change the laws
Found in /r/canada/Apr 11, 2025
Totally normal: "Federal Reserve ‘absolutely’ ready to help stabilise market if needed"
💬 338 comments
⬆︎ 2813 upvotes
Comments mention the Supreme Court in relation to political actions.
Found in /r/wallstreetbets/Apr 6, 2025
Newsom Will Seek Trade Deals That Spare California From Retaliatory Tariffs
💬 774 comments
⬆︎ 7551 upvotes
The user is skeptical about the plan, but doesn't express strong negativity.
Found in /r/California/Apr 2, 2025
What’s with the outrage claiming the federal courts not having jurisdiction to check the President?
💬 194 comments
⬆︎ 276 upvotes
Referenced in the context of legal proceedings and potential impacts of decisions.
Found in /r/Lawyertalk/Subscribe to our newsletter!
Stay up to date on how the latest changes in AI might impact your marketing plan.